We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be arrived at, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is often a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents on the boy or Lady do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they're able to do if they could Reduce off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by regulation.
Only the written opinions with the Supreme Court plus the Court of Appeals are routinely offered. Decisions from the decrease (trial) courts usually are not generally published or dispersed.
12. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons acquiring their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to complete absent with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case law inside a particular court. Indeed, Each individual circuit has its possess set of binding case law. Due to this fact, a judgment rendered inside the Ninth Circuit will not be binding inside the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
The implied consent case law reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should be capable to deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[4]
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there might be one or more judgments given (or reported). Only the reason for the decision with the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may be adopted within an argument.
States also typically have courts that manage only a specific subset of legal matters, for example family regulation and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common legislation, is definitely the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending to the relationship between the deciding court along with the precedent, case regulation may be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for your Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) will not be strictly bound to Stick to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by one particular district court in New York just isn't binding on another district court, but the first court’s reasoning may help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions because of the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more